Karin Sennefelt

En ny sorts historerevisionism
2009/03/09, 23:10
Filed under: historia | Etiketter:

”We’re not saying that there weren’t a few tremors on the morning of 4/18, but we do question whether ‘earthquake’ was the proper term to classify them,” said Compson, adding that he sees himself as more of a 1906 Earthquake Revisionist than a 1906 Earthquake Denier. ”These geologists and their fancy-looking, detailed seismic readouts simply aren’t telling us the whole story.”  Mer här.

Kommentarer inaktiverade för En ny sorts historerevisionism

Kommentarer inaktiverade.

%d bloggare gillar detta: